July 23rd, 2013 04:20 PM║ Posted By: John Pennington ║ Permalink
║ Schools: Alabama, Arkansas, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, LSU, Mississippi State, Missouri, Ole Miss, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas A&M, Vanderbilt
Tags: FCS, Football Bowl Subdivision, Football Championship Subdivision, NCAA
Here’s a sampling of what others are saying:
Welcome to the party, everyone. Not to go all Clay Travis on everybody, but we’ve been banging this drum for a bit longer than just one week. For months we’ve been saying that a super-division is coming, that a full-scale breakaway from the NCAA would be impossible to pull off (good luck creating a whole new rule book, organization, etc), and that the only question remaining is how many schools will be welcomed into the new grouping.
Heck, Mike Slive rattled his own super-division saber back in April. For some reason that didn’t generate the national coverage we’re seeing now, but it happened. At the time, the SEC’s commish had this to say about his belief that the NCAA needed to change its ways and allow those schools that can afford to pay players to do so:
“When there are certain things that many of us would like to come into play, it’s our hope that those things can all occur in the current system. Obviously, if things like that don’t get accomplished, then it may be appropriate to talk about some alternative or division or something like that. But that’s not our desire. That’s not our goal and that’s not something we’re trying to get to.”
That was April. Going back a bit further, here’s what Slive had to say last December:
“There are some matters of concern to some of us, like full-cost-of-tuition scholarships. And there is a level of frustration over the difficulty we’ve had in getting it through the system. And so there are some differences between some conferences. It’s just our hope that we can work through that in this system.”
By mid-April it had become clear that there is simply too much opposition to stipends or full-cost-of-tuition scholarships within the NCAA. And for good reason. The NCAA is made up of more than 1,000 colleges and universities. Somewhere between 65 and 80 have the financial wherewithal to offer more cash to their student-athletes. Sixty-five or 80… out of a thousand. All those have-nots don’t want to be left behind. And some refuse to budge on the issue simply as a matter of principle.
“The issue has driven a wedge through an already divided Division I. Some institutions, including those that don’t compete in football at the highest levels, say they simply don’t have the revenue to offset the added costs. Others worry that making additional payments to players — no matter how small, and for whatever reason — threatens the amateur model.”
So trace it back and you can see that there’s nothing new in this week’s super-division talk, other than the fact that commissioners are beginning to speak more openly about the possibility of a shift. But that, too, was predictable. Just think about it.
The big conferences say they want to give more cash to athletes. Everyone else says, “You can’t do it.” The big conferences have start talking more seriously about a new division, even hinting at a full exodus from the NCAA in order to let the smaller schools and conferences know that they mean business. Eventually, a new super-division will be created in order to prevent a complete secession. It will be hailed as a great compromise that benefits everyone.
Now, in case you’re interested in seeing just we’ve written on this topic and when, here’s a list:
May 13th, 2013: Further Proof That A New Division — Not A Breakaway — Is Coming
So what will a new super-division look like? Will it exist as a football-only division? If schools intend to pay athletes other than football players then we’re looking at a new division overall. It’s doubtful, for example, that basketball schools like Marquette and Georgetown would want to compete in the same division with schools offering larger scholarships or stipends that they themselves do not provide.
Flipping that around, if schools intend to pay only football players, you can expect moans, groans and possibly lawsuits from female athletes and athletes who play non-revenue sports. Best guess? Creating a new super-division will be messy.
That’s why we’re willing to step in and try to help out. In May of 2012, we posted an article called “10 Steps To Better College Football Livin’” and in it the #1 item on the list was: “Set Up New NCAA Divisions Based Upon Budgets and Winning.” Basically, if we were the NCAA, we would re-work today’s college football landscape and create a five-tiered system. We would attempt to give full-cost-of-tuition scholarships to football players only, arguing — in court, if necessary — that football creates the greatest revenue stream in collegiate athletics by far. For our purposes, let’s assume the argument would hold up.
Currently, college football is broken into four groups:
|Post Comments »||Comments (14)|