January 18th, 2013 02:16 PM║ Posted By: John Pennington ║ Permalink
║ Schools: Alabama, Arkansas, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, LSU, Mississippi State, Missouri, Ole Miss, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas A&M, Vanderbilt
Tags: Alabama, Auburn, Cam Newton, Dan Aykroyd, Mark Emmert, NCAA, So Newton
The NCAA rule book is too thick.
To quote Dan Aykroyd as Bob Dole: “You know it, I know it, and the American people know it.” NCAA president Mark Emmert knows it, too.
At yesterday’s NCAA convention in Grapevine, Texas, Emmert admitted the following:
“It turns out we know how to write rules. One of the problems is sometimes we write lots and lots and lost of rules…
Just as the shiny side of the competition has the side that can also bring dysfunction to it, so too can the regulatory side. And we have to recognize that as we try to balance that coin on its edge.”
Emmert’s comments come as the NCAA is re-working its rule book and trying to make things simpler. Coaches and fans have been yelping for such action for years.
But there’s a problem that comes with ripping pages from the NCAA manual — less rules will mean more loopholes. Less black-and-white will mean more gray.
Let’s look back at the Cam Newton situation as an example. As Auburn was roaring toward the BCS title in 2010, all eyes focused on Newton as it became clear that his father had asked some Mississippi State boosters for cash in exchange for his son’s signature. But Newton was not punished. First, he supposedly had no idea of his father’s actions. Second, Newton signed with Auburn, not MSU. Third, no smoking gun was ever found tying Auburn to alleged payments. So Newton played. Auburn won. And everything — especially on The Plains — was hunky-dory.
But should a parent be able to ask for cash in exchange for his son’s services on a football field or basketball court? Obviously the answer is no. So the NCAA closed the so-called Newton loophole at last year’s convention. The rule-makers decided to expand the definition of an agent to include third-party influences including parents. Meaning that if a player’s parent — acting as an agent — has his or her hand out asking for loot, the player will be ruled ineligible just as quickly as if an agent had tried to broker a deal for him. No cash has to even change hands. Ask for money, your kid is ineligible.
|Post Comments »||Comments (14)|