One great player — even a lineman — an make a difference
I believe one player can make the difference in a game, if it’s a great quarterback, running back, receiver or defensive player.
But I didn’t believe an offensive lineman could make that much difference - until now.
I don’t know if Alabama would have beaten unbeaten Utah if left tackle Andre Smith had played (he was suspended for alleged improper relations with an agent). But I would have liked the Crimson Tide’s chances in the Sugar Bowl.
With Smith, maybe Alabama moves the ball better early and doesn’t fall behind 21-0 in the first quarter. With Smith, maybe Alabama runs the ball more effectively - Glen Coffee and Mark Ingram combined for 62 yards on 21 carries for a team that averaged 196.5 on the ground during the season. Counting sacks, Bama netted 31 rushing yards
With Smith, there’s no doubt in my mind Tide quarterback John Parker Wilson wouldn’t have been sacked eight times. Alabama allowed 17 sacks all season.
Most of Utah’s sacks came from the left tackle spot vacated by Smith.
With Utah ahead 28-17 in the fourth quarter and Alabama forced to throw, the Tide was unable to protect against the Utes’ smaller but quicker defensive front.
No SEC team dominated Alabama’s offensive line the way Utah’s did.
It didn’t help that Smith’s replacement, Mike Johnson, suffered a first-half injury, causing the Tide to shuffle its blockers. For most of the game, only two Tide linemen played their regular position.
If not for Wilson’s mobility, the sack total could have been 15 as Wilson eluded rushers and scrambled out of trouble repeatedly.
This isn’t to take away from the win by Utah, a team which deserves to be ranked in the top five. It just emphasizes the significance of losing one great player - even if it is an offensive lineman.
Chavis likes LSU tradition, talent
One reason former Tennessee defensive coordinator John Chavis took the job at LSU over Clemson is his feeling that the Baton Rouge Tigers have a better shot at winning a national championship.
LSU has won two national titles since 2003.
Clemson hasn’t won one since 1981 and hasn’t won an ACC title since 1990.
But I think there are three other factors that contributed to Chavis’ decision.
One, no SEC team has had as much defensive line talent since 2000 as LSU. In fact, only Southern Cal rivals LSU for producing defensive linemen this decade.
Consider these guys: Jarvis and Howard Green, Marcus Spears, Claude Wroten, Chad Lavalais, Glenn Dorsey, Kyle Williams, Markeise Hill, Charles Alexander, Tyson Jackson, Ricky Jean-Francois, Marlon Favorite, Rahim Alem, Al Woods and Kirston Pittman, to name more than a few.
Secondly, Chavis’ familiarity with the SEC. He knows the other coaches, he knows the personnel, he knows the schemes. The transition to LSU will be more seamless than the move to Clemson.
Thirdly, I believe Chavis has a strong desire to prove to the Tennessee administration it made a mistake by firing Phillip Fulmer and the entire defensive staff. Chavis has a long memory, and he would like nothing better than to whip the Vols in Neyland Stadium or Tiger Stadium or the Georgia Dome.
Bowl results aren’t defining
The results of bowl games are not THE defining moment for determining the strength of a conference.
If that were the case, the Pac-10 would clearly be the nation’s best conference after going 5-0 in bowls, Conference USA would rival the Big 12 and SEC for second best, the Big East (3-2) would be better than the ACC (4-6) and the Big Ten (1-5) would be a no better than the WAC.
However, bowl games can be an indicator.
And from all indications, the SEC - 6-9 against BCS non-conference opponents in the regular season — has gained a measure of respect.
The SEC was 5-2 heading into the national championship game between Florida and Oklahoma. It beat a one-loss team from the Big 12, the Conference USA champion, a team that played for the ACC title and a 14th-ranked team from the ACC.
Thanks to huge breaks, Vanderbilt beat Boston College and Kentucky upset East Carolina. Vandy got eight first downs and needed a muffed punt for a touchdown to snap the Eagles’ nation’s best eight-game bowl win streak. Kentucky returned a kickoff for a score, then got a game-winning fumble recovery return.
LSU and Ole Miss thoroughly outplayed Georgia Tech and Texas Tech, respectively. And underdog Utah took it to Alabama.
I’ve felt this season that many SEC offenses were inferior and that SEC defenses were overrated due to playing against poor offenses.
To a degree, the bowl numbers bear that out.
Only one SEC team had more than 331 total yards - Ole Miss piled up 515 against Texas Tech. And only two SEC teams exceeded their regular season scoring average - Ole Miss with 47 points (40 by the offense) and LSU with 38 (31 by the offense).
Vandy’s offense had 200 yards, eight first downs and nine points. Kentucky’s offense scored 12 points. South Carolina had a field goal until a meaningless touchdown in the final minutes.
In the seven bowls, SEC offenses averaged 314.3 yards while allowing 346.3 yards per game. SEC offenses scored 21 points per game while defenses allowed 19.1 points.
And four SEC offenses scored no more than 12 points in a bowl game.
Still, the SEC’s 5-2 mark (2-0 against the ACC) is a solid showing.
How long will Spurrier remain at SC?
By far, South Carolina turned in the worst performance by an SEC team in a bowl.
The Gamecocks were disinterested and noncompetitive in a 31-10 loss to Iowa, which recorded the Big Ten’s only bowl victory.
Two of Steve Spurrier’s players - Captain Munnerlyn and Eric Norwood - declared for the NFL the day of the game. I wonder if they declared at halftime. And, leading tackler Emmanuel Cook was academically ineligible while tight end Jared Cook looked in like November he had his eye on the NFL, not Florida or Clemson.
I wouldn’t call that a revolt against Spurrier, but it’s evident he doesn’t command the respect of the Gamecocks the way he did the Gators. And do you really think Spurrier is thrilled about coaching quarterback Stephen Garcia next season?
South Carolina’s offense doesn’t figure to be any better next year, considering the personnel losses. And the defense loses at least six key players.
If Spurrier doesn’t win at least eight games next season, he might get frustrated to the point of stepping down.
In four years in Columbia, he’s 28-22. That’s not his idea of fun. And he’s done nothing to add to a rather empty trophy case - except win a minor bowl game.