From time to time, when you see a good idea, it’s just fine to rip it off.
As long as you give credit where credit is due.
For the past few seasons, I’ve been a fan of the website, ColdHardFootballFacts.com.
They’re sports fans. They’re geeks. And they use their calculators to break down the NFL.
In doing so, they’ve developed a couple of interesting ways to grade teams’ offensive and defensive production.
We’ll take one of their formulas — “scoreability” — and apply it to the 2008 SEC football season (including bowl stats).
What is scoreability?
Well, it’s damn sure better than “drinkability,” that stupid Bud Light campaign that (for some unknown reason) has replaced Bud Light’s always funny ads in this year’s television rotation.
Scoreability is “a team-wide measurement, not just a measurement of offensive efficiency. It takes into account a variety of factors, such as the proficiency of defense and special teams, red zone offense and turnover differential.”
To put it more simply, we look at the total offensive yards gained by a team and compare it to the total number of points scored by that team.
Some points come off of defensive scores, some off returns and blocks. That’s all figured into this mathematical mix.
So, without further ado, here are the SEC’s teams ranked from 1 to 12 in terms of their ability to score points easily in 2008:
1. Florida (10.2) — The Gators scored one point this season for every 10.2 yards they gained on offense. It should surprise no one that they led the league in scoring… this team not only had a high-powered offense, but their special teams accounted for several scores as well.
2. Alabama (11.8) – Just to be clear, that means the smashmouth, grind it out Tide scored one point for every 11.8 yards they gained on offense.
3. LSU (11.9) — Considering the troubles they had with turnovers, that’s an awfully solid tally.
4. Ole Miss (12.7) — Before the season I wondered how Houston Nutt’s “Wild Rebel” would mesh with Kent Austin’s CFL-schemes. Pretty darn well, it turns out.
5. Kentucky (13.2) – Didn’t see that one coming did you? Kentucky was near the bottom of the league in total yards, but in the upper half of the conference in terms of points scored. It might not have been pretty, but UK scored more easily than six other SEC teams.
6. Vanderbilt (13.4) — Again, near the bottom on yards and near the bottom on points, Vandy made the most of their chances. It’s just that their chances were rare.
7. Georgia (13.5) — How can this be? Georgia was second only to Florida in terms of yardage in 2008. Yes, but they were fourth (almost fifth) in terms of points scored. Red zone troubles anyone?
8. South Carolina (15.2) — We’re really starting to see a drop-off now. Steve Spurrier’s offense just can’t convert drives into points. Too many turnovers and interceptions.
9. Tennessee (15.5) – The Vols managed just one point for every 15-and-a-half yards gained in 2008.
10. Arkansas (17.0) — Bobby Petrino’s team finished in the top half of the league in total offensive yardage, but they were eighth in terms of points scored.
11. Auburn (17.5) — Hope that new smashmouth spread works better than the old spread.
12. Mississippi State (18.1) — To put this in perspective, let’s look at MSU in terms of a touchdown. For every seven points the Bulldogs put up in 2008, they had to gain 126.7 yards of offense.
By comparison, Florida would score 7 points after every 71.4 yards of offense.
And just for the record, here are the final 2008 tallies:
| SCHOOL | YDS GAINED |
PTS SCORED |
|
| ALABAMA | 4981 |
422 |
|
| ARKANSAS | 4477 |
263 |
|
| AUBURN | 3635 |
208 |
|
| FLORIDA | 6231 |
611 |
|
| GEORGIA | 5538 |
409 |
|
| KENTUCKY | 3891 |
294 |
|
| LSU | 4785 |
402 |
|
| OLE MISS |
5299 |
417 |
|
| MISS. STATE |
3312 |
183 |
|
| S. CAROLINA |
4115 |
270 |
|
| TENNESSEE | 3225 |
208 |
|
| VANDERBILT | 3331 |
249 |













January 12th, 2009 at 8:45 pm
Who Can Compete With Florida?
… and the rabbit says Hitler…
THE COLLEGE FOOTBALL BOWL CHAMPIONSHIP SERIES (BCS) DECLARES GERMANY WINNER OF WORLD WAR II US Ranked 4th After determining the Big-12 college football championship game participants the BCS computers were put to work on other major contests and today the BCS declared Germany to be the winner of World War II. “Germany put together an incredible number of victories beginning with the annexation of Austria and the Sudetenland and continuing on into conference play with defeats of Poland, France, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium and the Netherlands. Their only losses came against the US and Russia; however considering their entire body of work–including an incredibly tough Strength of Schedule–our computers deemed them worthy of the #1 ranking.” Questioned about the #4 ranking of the United States the BCS commissioner stated “The US only had two major victories–Japan and Germany. The computer models, unlike humans, aren’t influenced by head-to-head contests–they consider each contest to be only a single, equally-weighted event.” German Chancellor Adolph Hiter said “Yes, we lost to the US; but we defeated #2 ranked France in only 6 weeks.” Herr Hitler has been criticized for seeking dramatic victories to earn ’style points’ to enhance Germany’s rankings. Hitler protested “Our contest with Poland was in doubt until the final day and the conditions in Norway were incredibly challenging and demanded the application of additional forces.” The French ranking has also come under scrutiny. The BCS commented ” France had a single loss against Germany and following a preseason #1 ranking they only fell to #2.” Japan was ranked #3 with victories including Manchuria, Borneo and the Philippines.
Something needs to be done about the whole BCS thing. Any one can compete with Florida in the SEC. Just de[ends on what team shows up to play… Just like the movie except pm Satirday. Any given Saturday.,….any given team. We have some awesome athletes out there right now. But then agaIn maybe I should tack another statement to my answer…. I call this the BCS answser..Depends on which part of the season you want to know about. The BCS seems to think that the teams don’t have to play consistemt…more points are weighted at year end play than rewarded for consistency all year.
Report as inappropriate