Albama Arkansas Auburn Florida Georgia Kentucky LSU Mississippi State Missouri Ole-Miss USC Tennessee Texas A&M Vanderbilt
Latest News

SEC Game Previews – 10/25/13

mrsec game previewWeek Nine is already underway — congrats to Mississippi State for last night’s win; kudos to Kentucky for showing continued fight — which means it’s time for our weekly SEC football primer.  Included are TV listings, Vegas odds, statistical comparisons, game keys, opinions and predictions.  It’s everything you need for Saturday’s six-pack of SEC contests.

And as always, good luck to your favorite team…


Vanderbilt (4-3) at #16 Texas A&M (5-2)

TV:  12:21pm ET on SEC TV

Opening Line:  A&M -18.5

Current Line:  A&M -17

One To Watch:  Vanderbilt QB Patton Robinette.  The redshirt freshman will make his first career start after subbing for an injured Austyn Carta-Samuels last week.  Robinette — who initially picked North Carolina over Vanderbilt — finished nine-of-15 last week with 41 yards and an interception.  He also had a nine-yard touchdown run.  Texas A&M’s defense is bad.  Can Robinette take advantage and keep the Commodores in this one?

This And That:

1.  A&M quarterback Johnny Manziel is expected to play tomorrow despite injuring his throwing shoulder against Auburn last weekend.  He was clearly in pain as he led A&M’s last-gasp drive and he was in a sling earlier this week.  It’s hard to imagine Johnny Football sitting this one out, but some are wondering if he should play, even if he’s cleared.  Fair question.  But from a football point of view only, Manziel at 75% is still better than most quarterbacks at 100%.

2.  We know the Aggies will surrender yards and points (they’re 14th in the SEC in both categories), but can Vandy slow Kevin Sumlin’s offense?  The Dores have been up and down on D all season allowing: 489 yards to Ole Miss, 139 to Austin Peay, 579 to South Carolina, 248 to UMass, 362 to UAB, 523 to Missouri, and then just 221 to an injury-riddled Georgia offense.  Against SEC foes only, VU ranks 10th in yards allowed and 12th in points allowed.  Chances are, A&M will get theirs.

3.  On the road against a ranked opponent that loves to go up-tempo.  Giving a quarterback his first start ever at rocking Kyle Field.  Those are the kinds of things that would normally lead a coach to rely on his run game and try to eat clock.  But Vandy’s strength is throwing the ball (#6 in pass offense in the SEC), not running it (#14 in rush offense).  So can the Commodores (4.1 yards per carry, #13 in the SEC) produce enough of a ground game against A&M’s shoddy defense (#14 in the SEC versus the run) to take some of the pressure off Robinette?

Prediction:  Texas A&M 47, Vanderbilt 27


Tennessee (4-3) at #1 Alabama (7-0)

TV:  3:30pm ET on CBS

Opening Line:  UA -26.5

Current Line:  UA -28.5

One To Watch:  Tennessee QB Justin Worley.  During Tennessee’s 3-2 start, the junior from South Carolina tossed eight TD passes and six interceptions.  In an overtime loss to Georgia and in an upset of Carolina last week, Worley has thrown two touchdowns against zero picks.  It hasn’t been pretty, but it has been effective.  If the Volunteers are to have any shot at all against Alabama, they’ll need for their quarterback to protect the football once more.  That won’t be easy against Bama’s D.

This And That:

1.  Alabama has been tested exactly once this season and they passed it with a 49-42 at College Station.  In the Tide’s other six games, they’ve won by a combined score of 236-26.  That’s a 39-4 average score, a five-touchdown margin of victory on average.  The best game anyone’s given Nick Saban’s team since its win over A&M?  Well, Ole Miss came within 25 in a 25-0 shutout loss.  Anything’s possible as we saw last week, but Bama is not the team any school wants to see on its schedule right now.

2.  Keep an eye on the red zone success for both squads.  Neither team is particularly good inside the opponents’ 20 (UA is #7 in the SEC while UT is #8).  Both teams are good when it comes to red zone defense.  Alabama is tops in the conference allowing scores just 63% of the time.  Tennessee ranks third best in the SEC allowing just a 73% conversion rate.  The difference?  Foes have only reached the red zone against the Tide 11 times all year (seven fewer than anyone else in the league).  Vol foes have reached the red zone 30 times, which is the most in the SEC.

3.  Turnovers played a major role in the SEC’s Upset Saturday a week ago.  In fact, all six SEC games went to the team that committed the fewest turnovers.  As mention above, the Vols have been better about giving the ball away in recent weeks, but UT is still 12th in the league in turnover margin (minus-two) when you look at conference games only.  Alabama is third best (plus-three).  Unless the Red Elephants get a sudden case of the whoopsies, the improving Vols’ chances just don’t look too good.

Prediction:  Alabama 38, Tennessee 10


Furman (3-4) at #13 LSU (6-2)

TV:  7:00pm ET on Pay-per-view

Opening Line:  LSU -47

Current Line:  LSU -47

One To Watch:  The turnstiles at Tiger Stadium.  Much was made of the 15,000 empty seats at Tiger Stadium for the Florida game two weeks ago.  That was Florida.  This is Furman.  Expect a smaller crowd.  And — to be honest — that’s exactly what LSU deserves for scheduling an FCS program.

This And That:

1.  It’s time for LSU to get its house back in order and the pushover Paladins from the Southern Conference should provide a perfect opportunity to do so.  First on the agenda is getting Zach Mettenberger back on track.  His numbers have slipped the past two weeks against Florida (win) and Ole Miss (loss).  Overall, the senior quarterback 67.9% of his passes with a 186.9 passer rating in LSU’s victories.  He’s completed just 60.0% of his throws and his passer rating has dropped to just 147.8 in the Tigers’ losses.  Cam Cameron was being hailed a genius just three weeks ago.  Time to win everyone over again.

2.  The second area of concern for LSU is on defense.  As in the whole defense.  Ole Miss upset the Bayou Bengals 27-24 in Oxford last week and they rolled up 525 yards of offense in the process.  The last team to hang 500+ on LSU was West Virginia (533) back in 2011.  Only two other times in the last seven years (Auburn in 2010, Arkansas in 2007) has a foe hung 500 yards on the Tigers.  To be fair, LSU is young on that side of the ball.  But John Chavis’ unit has yielded 437 or more yards in four of the school’s five SEC games to date.

3.  Les Miles said this week — after the loss to Mississippi — that it’s time to give some more young guys the chance to play.  Is it any coincidence that he said that with Furman coming up this weekend?  You’d better believe he’s going to be protecting as many starters as possible with #1 Alabama up next on the Tigers’ schedule.  Miles got his youth in the game last year against tiny Towson and as a result the 38-22 score was a bit closer than most would have expected.  Might we see something similar tomorrow?

Prediction:  LSU 38, Furman 17


#21 South Carolina (5-2) at #5 Missouri (7-0)

TV:  7:00pm ET on ESPN2

Opening Line:  USC -5

Current Line:  MU -3

One To Watch:  South Carolina RB Mike Davis.  The Gamecocks have in Davis the SEC’s leading rusher.  The 5-9, 215-pound tailback is averaging 6.6 yards per carry and 125.5 yards per game.  Quarterback Dylan Thompson will be making his first start of the year for USC.  It would be best to lean on Davis early and often and set up the pass with the run, right?  One problem: Steve Spurrier loves to throw the ball.  Carolina has thrown 198 passes on the season.  A whopping 139 of those have come in the first half of games (versus only 59 in the second half).  Run the ball, Steve.

This And That:

1.  Maty Mauk and the Missouri offense didn’t stumble as the young QB made his first start (filling in for an injured James Franklin) last week against Florida.  But while the Tigers did hang 36 on the Gators, Mauk’s completion percentage was just 50% (18-of-36) and he threw one TD and one INT.  Franklin had completed less than 65% of his passes just once all season.  Mauk will need to be more accurate to keep the chains moving against Carolina.  (And speaking of Mizzou quarterbacks, third-stringer Corbin Berkstresser is out with a leg injury, meaning the Tigers have only true freshman Eddie Printz behind Mauk.)

2.  Keep an eye on the pass rushers in this one.  And, no, we’re not starting with Jadeveon Clowney.  Missouri is the team with the SEC’s best pass rush.  The Tigers have recorded 23 sacks on the season with nine coming from defensive end Michael Sam.  Meanwhile, teams have been spending so much time doubling up on USC’s Clowney (who did have a “Clowney-esque” game last week), that it’s opened the door for defensive tackle Kelcy Quarles to get pressure up the middle.  Quarles has five of USC’s 15 sacks.  Clowney has two.  Now, with Thompson making his first start of the season and Mauk making just his second start ever, pressure off the edge or a push up the middle and into the quarterback’s feet could cause either quarterback to get a bit too antsy.  (In case you’re wondering, USC has allowed 14 sacks on the year while MU has allowed 15.)

3.  Before last Saturday’s upset at the hands of Tennessee, Carolina had looked like one of the hottest teams in the league.  Then, from out of nowhere, the Gamecocks laid an egg.  That’s just how quickly things can change in the Southeastern Conference.  Rolling one minute, tumbling the next.  Missouri is playing better football than South Carolina right now.  The Tigers’ success has not been a fluke.  But at some point the bubble is bound to pop and USC has a balanced mix of offense and defense.  The Cocks are due for a big win while the Tigers are due for a loss.

Prediction:  South Carolina 35, Missouri 34


Florida Atlantic (2-5) at #11 Auburn (6-1)

TV:  7:30pm ET on FSN

Opening Line:  AU -28

Current Line:  AU -24

One To Watch:  The Auburn trainers.  The Tigers are on a nice roll and have jumped all the way to #11 in the BCS standings.  The Plainsmen don’t need to get important contributors injured in a game with an FBS pipsqueak, though that’s usually about all these kinds of games are good for.

This And That:

1.  Gus Malzahn has to be pleased with the improvement and development he’s seen from quarterback Nick Marshall on a game-by-game basis.  In his first two starts, Marshall accounted for 163 yards per game of total offense.  In his four starts since he’s averaged 300 yards rushing/passing per contest.  He rolled up 336 yards of total offense (236 passing and 100 rushing) in leading Auburn to an upset win at Texas A&M.  In addition, the juco transfer passed for two scores, ran for two others, and didn’t throw an interception.

2.  Florida Atlantic has allowed 303 yards rushing to Miami (FL), 396 yards rushing to Middle Tennessee State, and 204 yards rushing to Rice.  That’s probably not real good news with the Owls visiting Auburn.  The Tigers are tops in the SEC in rushing offense with a per-game average of right at 300 yards.  Expect Malzahn to pound FAU in the mouth, run up a lead, and then get the backups in.

3.  On paper, the one Achilles’ heel for AU this year has been its secondary.  The Tigers still rank dead last in the league in pass defense (allowing 282.0 yards through the air each week).  But.  Rival passers have a QB rating of 124.2 against Auburn, which is actually a middle-of-the-SEC-pack number.  Yes, Ellis Johnson’s defensive unit has given up yards, but they’ve also had more passes thrown their way than any SEC team outside of Missouri.  In fact, only five leagues teams have recorded more INTs than TDs allowed and Auburn is in that group.  So while pass defense might look like a weakness, it’s not certainly not as bad as some of the numbers suggest.  Beware, FAU.

Prediction:  Auburn 42, FAU 13


Idaho (1-6) at Ole Miss (4-3)

TV:  7:30pm ET on CSS

Opening Line:  UM -40

Current Line:  UM -41.5

One To Watch:  Another game on television, maybe?  Idaho is an independent at the bottom of the FBS ranks.  Like LSU/Furman, we have zero interest in watching this one.  Bet Rebel fans feel the same way.  Here’s guessing the Grove will have better attendance than the second half of this one.

This And That:

1.  When talking about the UM offense, you have to start with Bo Wallace.  The junior QB currently ranks fourth in the SEC in total offense, fifth in passing offense, and he’s taken much better care of the football in 2013.  Last season, Wallace threw 22 picks against a miserable 17 interceptions.  This season he’s cleaned that up to the point that he has nine scores and only three picks.  You can win a lot of games with a quarterback who’s both a dual-threat and smart with the football.

2.  Just how terrible is Idaho?  The Vandals lost by 34 to North Texas, by 32 to Wyoming, by 10 to Northern Illinois, by 42 to Washington State, by 47 to Fresno State and by 24 to Arkansas State.  Pity poor Temple, the one team the Vandals vanquished, 26-24.  Idaho now goes on the long list of worst cupcakes lined up by SEC coaches and ADs this season.

3.  How good of a job has Hugh Freeze done at Ole Miss in his first 1.5 seasons?  When was the last time you can remember the Rebels being favored by 41.5 points versus anybody?

Prediction:  Ole Miss 45, Idaho 10


John at MrSEC
John at MrSEC moderator

bivouac77 and Statesman...

No one on the internet has written more favorably about Missouri than yours truly.  We were the first site to mention Missouri's potential positives for the SEC a full year before anyone else started kicking MU's name around (for the same reasons we'd already suggested).

Numerous times I've personally written that SEC fans dismissing Missouri should wake up.

This week, I've written piece after piece (Weekend Wrap, Power Rankings, MU's physicality, etc, etc) praising Missouri.

But you -- as fringe fans often do -- chose not to read any of those.  Instead you choose to claim that if I say Mizzou is due for a loss it MUST be because I hate Missouri, boo-hoo, whine, cry, sniffle.  And then you fire your insults (which I have no problem matching, thank you).

So let me make this clear: I have nothing against Missouri.  Obviously this pick was a tough one as I have them losing by all of one point.  But if they do lose, I would invite you anonymous dips to come back, sign your names and kiss my rear.  But you won't do that.  

Missouri not a fit for the SEC?  Please.  You two prove that Mizzou has a fringe element of the fanbase that's just as shortsighted, conspiracy-obsessed, and rotten as any other school in the SEC.  

People occasionally claim that I hate "the fans."  I tell them, "No I don't.  I hate STUPID fans."  And every school has a few. 

To complain about the one site that's given Missouri a fair shake from before Day One?  Pathetic.

As for my credibility, I'm not the clown hiding behind a goofy pseudonym.

As Les Miles once said, have a great day.



Seriously. How many SEC teams does Mizzou have to dismantle before you'll pick them to win a league game? No one has come within two touchdowns of the Tigers all year. Mizzou isn't f*cking around. Learn to recognize, Mr. SEC. 


And the Missouri fans start loading your email up with hate in 3,2,1...............


@bivouac77 I clicked on here hoping that he would pick against Missouri for the 4th time in a row...  It seems like "mr sec" picking against Mizzou is good luck for the Tigers. 

Seriously though, I think they have their hands full tomorrow with USC and expect an amazing game that could go either way.  Far better than that UCLA vs. Oregon stinker gameday decided to go to instead. 


@mb6783  No hate.  Missouri fans understand John(MrSec) does not know much about Missouri.  Heck he thought Missouri City was in Missouri and not Texas.  We also understand that the SEC old guard is rooting against Mizzou.  They believe that Mizzou's early success takes away from the conference image(how could an outsider be so successful if the SEC is strong?).  It does not but the SEC old-guard is so insecure, that they are now crediting injuries to the teams that Mizzou beat. 

What about injuries to Mizzou last year?...Did not matter we were told we lacked depth....Where's the SEC depth?  Heck Mizzou starts 4 2-stars on defense & 1 4-star.  Georgia & Fla has 4-stars on the bench.  Proof that the star-system does not matter.   At some point John will be correct......Mizzou will lose & the old guard will feel comfortable.  In the meantime John keep losing credibility.

John at MrSEC
John at MrSEC moderator

@bpa_kc @bivouac77

If any of you Missouri folks cared about whether you're lying or not, you could have checked to see that I'm actually 3-0 against the spread with Mizzou in SEC games.  Guess those questioning my credibility aren't worried about their own:

* Picked Missouri to beat Vandy and cover (which kind of blows the whole "you never pick us / picked against four in a row" lies)

* Picked Missouri to cover vs Georgia

* Picked Missouri to cover vs Florida

If I were a betting man my knowledge of the Tigers would be making me rich.



@Statesman @mb6783 I am a fan of Missouri and they are a  welcome addition to the SEC. I usually cheer for Missouri in the east over everybody but my beloved Tennessee Vols who is picked to lose 38-10 to Alabama and that is wrong as well. Tennessee will make a closer game of it than that. I hope Missouri beats South Carolina then loses a close one to Tennessee next saturday. I actually would love for Missouri to play Alabama in the SEC championship game and win since Tennessee already has 2 SEC loses.

John at MrSEC
John at MrSEC moderator

@bpa_kc @John at MrSEC 

Chill?  Hey, if we had written any of the things you're whining about I'd chill.  

But you and a couple of others decided to come to this site, use our content to get eyeballs on your own comments... in which you totally misrepresent what we've written about Missouri and hold us accountable for what some other unnamed people have said.

Look, you want to disagree with something WE wrote?  Fine.  People do that all the time and they get no negative response from me.  But when you tell other readers that we're not credible (when we're a helluva lot more credible and objective than anyone posting under our stories), that we hate Missouri (when we don't), that we've never picked Missouri (when we have), and so on, well, don't be surprised when we call you and your pals out for it.  That's an attempt to damage our reputation and drive people from the site.  Give me your business address and we'll see how long you like it when I show up out front with a bullhorn and a sandwich board.

When Missouri arrived in this conference -- again, zero credit for pushing that move a full year before it happened and for the right reasons -- we wrote that Pinkel might just be the next Petrino stating specifically that we'd soon find out if is a coach who can win without 4- and 5-star talent.  So you're long response -- point for point -- has nothing to do with this site.  Yet you came here, made incorrect statements and agreed with others who made uglier, whinier statements.

Correct our mistakes.  State a different opinion.  You do that and all's well.

Misquote or misrepresent what we've written and you better believe you'll be called on it.  Insult us and you can count on getting as good as you gave (at least if I'm the guy reading the comments).

We spend a lot of hours on this site every day.  It's objective and it doesn't pander for clicks and pageviews.  It's free information and plenty of it.  You don't have to say thanks, but you darn well better not lie about what we've written.




@John at MrSEC Chill dude.  I am still back here posting after the 2012 season we had.  If Missouri makes it to Atlanta at 10-2 or even 9-3.... then I will dance a jig. 

I will say that for our program, this year is more the "norm" than the "exception".  2012 was awful, but IMHO, Gary Pinkel is the one of the best coaches in the SEC if not the nation.  I mean, how many top 25 or even top 10 teams can you produce out of 2 and 3 * recruits before people admit that you can coach your arse off.  Last year when Missouri had an injured starting qb and 4/5 starting o-linemen injured... all we heard was that It wasn't an excuse because real sec teams have "depth".. but this year it is that we are only winning  because sec teams have injuries...  forget that our best offensive player and defensive player are out with injury....  or that Florida had more 4* talent on the bench than Missouri had on their entire roster. 

John at MrSEC
John at MrSEC moderator

@bpa_kc @John at MrSEC 

Well, that's the freedom you have when you can come to someone's site, try to drive others away by posting lies about it, and do it all from the safety provided by a cowardly pseudonym.  If I'm ever wrong, people point it out forever.  If you guys are wrong, hey, you're just bpa_kc... what do you care?

It's funny... until tonight I'd been hoping Missouri could win a few more to hush up all those who said they weren't SEC-worthy.  (See, we got a lot of digs for pushing Mizzou as a candidate back in 2010.)  But after dealing with a few of you who take offense to someone making a simple game prediction, I'm having second thoughts.  Might be fun to see the Tigers get smacked around so all you guys can come back down to earth.

I notice all the Texas A&M fans who ripped me for picking the Aggies to lose multiple games this year are nowhere to be found these days.  The same will happen when Missouri loses.  Not one Tiger fan will come back and say, "Gee, sorry I acted like a 5-year-old."

As for Kansas, I'm guessing they'd have about the same number of fans come here and whine about someone picking against them, too.  From where I'm sitting at this moment, I don't see a helluva lot of difference between the fringe element of the Missouri and Kansas fanbases.

Oh, and as I've said on about 15 different radio stations this week -- I think Missouri reaches Atlanta.  But I think they do it with two losses.  Sue me.



@John at MrSEC We don't care about the beating the spread... we aren't Kansas...  My bad on Vandy.  I must have been thinking about somebody else's pick on that one... 


  1. Hot Topics…

    [...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]…

  2. Hermes Bags Replica

    It is a good post and thanks for sharing.\nBuy Cheap Hermes Handbags Outlet Online

  3. this site says:


    How would I go about creating a new blog that could become successful in less than a year. I have a lot of ideas of different things I could include, so I don’t know that content would be an issue. What are good ways to promote a new blog and is it be…

  4. I like your blog

    what is the best free website to start a successful blogg?

Follow Us On:
Mobile MrSEC