Albama Arkansas Auburn Florida Georgia Kentucky LSU Mississippi State Missouri Ole-Miss USC Tennessee Texas A&M Vanderbilt
Latest News

SEC Looking At A League-Wide Drug Testing Policy Once Again

mrsec-breaking-newsBrett McMurphy of reports today that “presidents, athletic directors and coaches of Southeastern Conference schools have discussed the possibility of the conference implementing a conference-wide substance abuse policy.”  That according to Georgia AD Greg McGarity.

This is not the first time the idea of a uniform testing policy has been brought up at the SEC’s annual meetings in Destin.  Commissioner Mike Slive has put a uniform policy on the agenda at least twice before only to have the league’s presidents decide that they would rather continue to implement their own policies.

At, we have pushed this issue on a number of occasions.  In our view, with the cash the SEC will now have rolling in, the league could mandate that all schools use the same company to conduct their tests.  According to McGarity, however, the league isn’t looking to involve itself in the minutiae of drug testing policies:


“I don’t think it’s necessary to get down into the weeds as far as how many times you test, what are the measurements, what are the minimum (levels for a positive test), but we believe there should be some type of consistent penalty (for each positive test).”


In other words, league officials simply want to stick a toe in the water before deciding whether to dive in all the way.  There’s an obvious problem attached to having consistent penalties without having control over any other aspects of testing — schools can test their athletes less often.  Schools could also set higher minimum requirements for positive tests.

There is absolutely no reason for the schools of the SEC not to conduct the same types of tests, the same number of tests, and dole out the same penalties for positive tests.

If the SEC presidents are queasy about drug testing issues being taken out of their hands, the league should at the very least set minimums that each school must abide by.  Example: The minimum number of tests is X.  The minimum limit for a positive result is Y.  If schools want to be tougher than the league’s mandated minimums, that would be up to the individual schools, but the minimums would be ironclad.

The goal of the league should be to get everyone on the same page.  Just dealing with penalties is a nice first step, but it doesn’t go far enough if the goal is actual equality in testing.

The league could bring the issue to a presidential vote tomorrow.



I thought the ncaa was all about taking care of the student athlete, his or her well being and making sure everyone is playing by the same rules???  Why don't they just add another paragraph to the massive rule book and set a standard for all student athletes and take it out of the hands of ad's/coaches etc...then we have no issue as to punishment being to lax etc...

John at MrSEC
John at MrSEC moderator


Testing all of the athletes on a campus can get very expensive.  So if the NCAA set a guideline, it would have to something that both the University of Florida and Howard University could afford (example).  That's why it's much easier for a conference to pull off.  In the SEC, everyone's going to be making a huge sum.

Thanks for reading,



@John at MrSEC @badbadhoggie Yes i'm sure it can be very expensive, and I don't have a clue as to who gets tested or how often??  I'm just saying that the penalties for failed test should be the same for all athletes and not left up to the coaches or ad's!


  1. [...] policySB NationWhy will the SEC move to nine league games? TVAtlanta Journal Constitution (blog)SEC Looking At A League-Wide Drug Testing Policy Once AgainMrSECall 5 news [...]

  2. [...] SEC considering league-wide drug policyCBSSports.comSEC Considering League-Wide Drug PolicyFanSidedMrSECall 6 news [...]

  3. Recommeneded Website…

    [...]Here’s the web site we recommend to our fellow Webmasters[...]…

Follow Us On:
Mobile MrSEC