The only reason the champions bowl got 80 million is because it was signed after the Rose Bowl. If the deal had been done before the Rose Bowl, the Champions Bowl would have gotten less.
Oh, timing surely helped a little, but the fact a "never-been-played" game is getting equal cash to "The Granddaddy of Them All" is still pretty eye-popping. And I doubt that if the -- oh, let's say -- Meineke Car Care Bowl signs a new TV deal next week that it will be worth $80 million.
Timing helped, but it's clear the football of SEC vs Big 12 is as big a draw to TV execs as the tradition and pageantry of the Rose Bowl. (A game like I watching every single year, by the way.)
Thanks or reading,
John


When it was announced earlier this month that ESPN would fork over $80 million dollars per year for the rights to broadcast the Rose Bowl, the common view was that the new SEC/Big 12 “Champions” Bowl would eventually sign a similar deal.




[...] permalink Looks like the B12/ISU are going to get paid: ESPN reportedly picks up another bowl’s broadcast rights | CollegeFootballTalk Homepage | MrSEC [...]
[...] Champions To Rake In As Much As Rose? If true, I'm surprised. Homepage | MrSEC [...]
[...] According to The Sports Business Journal — hefty subscription required — ESPN has agreed to pay “roughly the same rights fee” to the “Champions” Bowl as it will the Rose Bowl. For now, the SEC and Big 12 own their game. Take $80 million and split it down the middle each year and you have the 10 Big 12 schools set to make $4 million a piece while the SEC’s 14 schools would bring in about $2.85 million annually. [More] [...]