Albama Arkansas Auburn Florida Georgia Kentucky LSU Mississippi State Missouri Ole-Miss USC Tennessee Texas A&M Vanderbilt
Latest News

Report: Bama Turns Down Wisconsin Series; Other Leagues Toughening Their Strength Of Schedule

Nick Saban hasn’t been afraid to put marquee programs on his team’s schedule.  Since 2008, Alabama has faced Clemson and Virginia Tech in Atlanta.  They’ve played Penn State at home and then on the road.  They’ll open with Michigan at Cowboys Stadium in Texas this season.  And Bama’s scheduled to return to Atlanta for their 2013 (Virginia Tech again) and 2014 (West Virginia) openers.

But the Tide wasn’t interested in playing Wisconsin. 

According to Badger AD and former coach Barry Alvarez, ESPN tried to set-up an Alabama-Wisconsin neutral site game recently, but UW favored a home-and-home series instead.  Alvarez told The Wisconsin State Journal that Saban declined that offer.

With the exception of the Penn State game at (Un)Happy Valley last fall, you’ll note that Saban has lined up key games with big-time foes mainly at neutral sites.  Perhaps he’s of the John Calipari school.  Of course, football is different than basketball… and lining up one neutral site game is different than lining up two or more per season.

As for Wisconsin, the Badgers are trying to beef up their schedule as college football transitions to a new playoff era.  One with a selection committee that will base its picks to some extent on strength of schedule.

UW is scheduled to play eight Big Ten games per season and will also be taking on a Pac-12 team each year as “big league” foe #9.  Alabama would have been a 10th quality opponent.

Alabama and other top SEC programs will likely try to keep at least nine quality foes from other power conferences on their schedules each year, but if schools like Wisconsin are trying to line up a 10th name opponent, that still puts the SEC behind the eight ball when it comes to the new playoff selection panel.  And that’s not even counting the Pac-12 where teams will play at least 10 power conference teams per year and some — like Southern Cal — will face 11 or even 12 depending on the year.

Just more evidence that the SEC will eventually have to go to a nine-game football schedule.  Whether the league’s coaches and ADs are frightened to do so or not.

(Oh, and for the record, Bama fans lost out on a great road trip in this deal.  Camp Randall Stadium and the city of Madison are favorites of this writer.)

 


14 comments
Opti
Opti

The SEC will add a ninth conference game per season when the networks pay for the additional inventory, either in direct broadcast licensing fees or via Project X, the SEC network.

Slive is simply saying...show me the money.

Don4654
Don4654

One reason Bama likes neutral site games is because they play them in areas they want to recruit in such as Dallas and Atlanta.I don't see much recruiting advantage to playing in Wisconsin.Also not sure when we could fit in a home and home in the next 8 years.

This comment has been deleted

alexadler13
alexadler13

@nick51417 The Badgers don't schedule shitty ACC teams, Finch. D2 schools give us better competition.

nick51417
nick51417

@alexadler13 and CU has been national champs before... #deathvalley #gotigers #keepyourfilthyhandsoffmyrock

nick51417
nick51417

@alexadler13 how many national championships in football does UW have? In the past 10 years how many bcs bowl games have they won? #none?

alexadler13
alexadler13

@nick51417 Never said Wisconsin was good for scheduling Bama, I said it shows they will schedule tough opponents. WKU gets paid to do that

nick51417
nick51417

@alexadler13 so by that logic Western Kentucky is good?

alexadler13
alexadler13

@nick51417 I'll admit their schedule has been weak in the past but if the Badgers are trying to schedule Bama, obviously they're not anymore

alexadler13
alexadler13

@nick51417 Clemson, the school you go to, has #none as well. So can you really talk? And we've won the Big 10 two years in a row #ontherise

Bocktean
Bocktean like.author.displayName 1 Like

Why would a school like Wisconsin want an all-or-nothing home and home instead of one neutral site game? Isn't one better than none?

 

Neutral site games are season openers. They hog the limelight. They get all the pre-season buzz, much like Bama-Michigan sneaks into most off-season columns about the upcoming season. I'm surprised Wisconsin would walk away from the opportunity. Alabama will find a suitable neutral site partner. Wisconsin won't find a similar opportunity.

 

Mistake by the Badgers.

AllTideUp
AllTideUp

 @Bocktean  Yeah, according to that article ESPN initiated the discussions for a neutral site game and Wisconsin offered the home and home which Bama then rejected.  It did not say that Bama rejected the idea of the neutral site game.  It implied that Bama was willing to go along with that and they might still be willing to do that if Wisconsin will drop the demand for the home and home.

Norton
Norton

All schools who seriously contend for championships will ensure their strength-of-schedule factor is up to par, they're not idiots.  Nine conference games can actually hurt at times when the weak sisters rotate on. 

kyallie
kyallie

FWIW, Alabama has Va Tech (ATL) in 2013, WVU (ATL) in 2014 and a home-and-home with Michigan State for 2016-17

John at MrSEC
John at MrSEC moderator

 @kyallie 

 

Hadn't seen the Michigan State series, but I pretty clearly mentioned the other two games right in the first paragraph:

 

"And Bama’s scheduled to return to Atlanta for their 2013 (Virginia Tech again) and 2014 (West Virginia) openers."

 

Thanks for reading,

John



Follow Us On:
Mobile MrSEC