Albama Arkansas Auburn Florida Georgia Kentucky LSU Mississippi State Missouri Ole-Miss USC Tennessee Texas A&M Vanderbilt
Latest News

From Best To Worst, A Comparison Of SEC Hoops Teams In 2010-11

Looking forward to the NCAA Tournament, we wanted to provide you with a team-by-team comparison of all the current SEC hoops resumes.  Below you’ll see the league’s NCAA hopefuls as well as the NIT wannabes… all the way down to the duds of the league in 2010-11.

You’ll be able to find each SEC squad’s:


* Overall record
* SEC record
* Current RPI
* Current strength of schedule
* Current computer rating (from Ken Pomeroy)
* Record over their last 10 games
* Record versus RPI Top 50 teams
* Record versus RPI Top 100 teams
* Record versus RPI Top 200 teams
* Losses Outside the Top 100


Teams are listed below according to their current RPI:

School
Overall
SEC
RPI
SOS
Comp. Rat.
Last 10
Vs Top 50
Vs Top 100
Vs Top 200
Bad Losses
Florida
24-6
13-3
10
6
18
8-2
10-2
15-3
19-6
3
Kentucky
22-8
10-6
12
13
10
6-4
8-5
9-8
17-8
1
Vanderbilt
21-9
9-7
26
14
28
6-4
5-7
10-7
15-9
2
Tennessee
18-13
8-8
36
3
55
4-6
8-6
11-10
14-12
3
Georgia
20-10
9-7
39
36
56
6-4
3-9
5-10
12-10
0
Alabama
20-10
12-4
79
125
48
7-3
3-3
4-6
9-10
3
Ole Miss
19-12
7-9
81
75
73
6-4
1-5
5-8
10-11
4
Miss. St.
17-13
9-7
112
88
119
6-4
2-4
4-9
9-11
4
Arkansas
18-12
7-9
120
111
100
4-6
3-5
5-8
7-11
3
S. Carolina
14-15
5-11
128
67
125
2-8
2-11
4-12
7-14
3
LSU
11-20
3-13
219
115
230
1-9
0-6
0-11
3-18
9
Auburn
10-19
4-12
254
146
211
4-6
1-5
2-8
4-15
11



At this point Florida, Kentucky, Vanderbilt and Tennessee are all expected to be in the NCAA Tournament.  Bracket masters Joe Lunardi, Jerry Palm and Andy Glockner place all four in their latest mock-ups.

But Tennessee is an unusual case.  They have some very good wins (Villanova, Pittsburgh, at Vanderbilt) and they would get credit for two more wins versus Top 50 RPI squads if Belmont were to move up a slot from #51.

But the Vols have struggled down the stretch losing six of their last nine games.  Against RPI Top 50 squads, UT has lost four of its last five. 

Thursday, they face Arkansas in the first round of the SEC Tournament, a team that beat UT in Fayetteville in January.  A win would definitely secure an at-large bid for Tennessee, but a loss?  The Vols are probably in the field now, but to be safe, they can’t afford to tank against the Hogs.

Georgia is in the field according to Palm, but not according to Lunardi and Glockner.  Lunardi has UGA as one of his “first four out” meaning they just miss his cut.

When you look at the other teams on the bubble from across the country — as we did here — you’ll find that the Dawgs stack up quite well.  But they still have to do work in Atlanta to lock up a bid.  First, UGA must face improving Auburn.  The Tigers’ won’t help Georgia’s RPI or strength of the schedule, they’ll just be an added victory (if, of course, Mark Fox’s team gets by them).  Beat Auburn and the Dawgs will face a potential play-in game with Alabama — another bubble team — in the second round.

UGA has a better resume than Alabama, but if they lose twice to the Tide in the final seven days of the season, will they get a bid over Bama?  While most forecasters projected six SEC teams into the Big Dance for much of the year, we’ve sat patiently at five.  Now that two gurus have dropped the SEC to four teams, we’re feeling even better about our prediction of five teams.  UGA needs to beat Auburn and Alabama to feel secure about grabbing that fifth slot.

Alabama is the true wild card in all of this.  They have finished strong, yes, but their strength of schedule (#125) is one of the worst among bubble teams.  Even their nifty SEC record (12-4) was dampened by a 2-3 record against RPI Top 50 foes.

The Crimson Tide are the only SEC bubble team with a big reason not to include them — that strength of schedule.  We spend so much time talking about why teams deserve to be in, occasionally we should reverse our thinking.  Which team’s have a reason to be left out?  If the selection committee takes that approach, then it’s hard to imagine Alabama getting a bid.

That said, could the committee ignore the fact that Bama would have beaten Georgia twice in seven days (if they defeat them in the SEC tourney’s second round)?  Tough call.

To be safe, Alabama needs to put together a strong, deep SEC tourney run.  In fact, they probably need to win at least two games and reach the league finals to earn an at-large bid.  And even then things could still get tricky.


Our projections going into the SEC tourney:

Florida is a #3 seed in the Big Dance and could possibly grab a #2 seed if it wins the SEC tourney.

Kentucky is a #4 seed, but the Wildcats’ consecutive wins over Vanderbilt, Florida and Tennessee (on the road) have them on the rise.

Vanderbilt is in and likely headed toward a #6 seed, depending on their play in Atlanta.

Tennessee is in, but they can’t afford a bad loss to Arkansas in the SEC tourney.  If they get in, they’re looking at anything from a #9 seed to a #12 seed.

Georgia and Alabama need to take care of business at the Georgia Dome to secure bids.  More than likely, they’ll wind up playing in the second round for the SEC’s final berth.  And that’s if UGA gets by Auburn.


UPDATE – Misters Glockner, Lunardi and Palm will update their brackets all week.  This report was based upon their Monday night brackets.

 


12 comments
BAMABABE
BAMABABE

Hey BAMANATION....chill the f**k out...you've been pretty rude with all your comments...take it down a notch...no one on here is being rude...why r u??

Kevin
Kevin

As a strong Vol fan (don't get me going on Pearl), I hate to admit that if we lose to Arkansas, we just don't deserve it at 18-14. Those are simply NIT numbers to me!

JBJ
JBJ

Wasn't one of Bama's so called "bad losses" to St. Peters early in the year? It seems as though St. Peters winning their conference tournament and being one of the first teams in the dance should help. Is this thinking wrong?

Houstonvol
Houstonvol

How much do you think the cloud hanging over the UT program effects their bubble position and might keep them out of the NCAA or have them receive a bad first round game, or even opening round game? I personally would love a 12 seed for UT. That would give us a winnable first and second round game. A number 8/9 seed would have us advancing to play a #1 seed.

BamaNation
BamaNation

It says losses outside the top 100 Johnny, not "Bad Losses". There is nothing to indicate that they are the same stat. I guess I'm unable to read your carpet baggin' mind. Learn to write, fool.

ndo3639
ndo3639

Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't Alabama have 3 wins versus top 50 (Kentucky, Tennessee, and Georgia). I know that maybe a small detail, but shouldn't head to head mean more than computer numbers?

BamaNation
BamaNation

Poor ol' Pennington is at it again. Come on John Boy. Georgia has at least one bad loss and that was to an unranked Alabama team.

johnmrsec
johnmrsec

Houstonvol...

Speaking to someone with knowledge of the selection process, Tennessee's off-court issues should not play a role. If a team is eligible then its eligible. Now, does that mean an individual debating in his head Team A versus Team B won't let knowledge of UT's troubles creep into his head? No. But if a team is eligible -- and UT is -- then the committee is supposed to consider them just like any other team.

Thanks for reading,
John

johnmrsec
johnmrsec

Bama Nation...

We list each and every stat you'll see in the chart... from 1 through 10... all in order at the top of the story. On the chart, without room to type "Losses to Teams Outside the Top 100" we simply used "Bad Losses." We assumed that someone could grasp if 1 = A and 2 = B and 3 = C and 4 = D and 5 = E and 6 = F and 7 = G and 8 = H and I = 9 that then J would = 10.

We assumed wrong.

John

johnmrsec
johnmrsec

ndo3639...

You are correct. I was initially considering using a stat that showed each team's record against its last five Top 50 opponents... Alabama was 2-3 in that stat. I was thinking 2-3 and typed it when it should indeed have been 3-3.

This has been corrected. My apologies.

As for head-to-head versus computer numbers, that all comes down to the selection committee. Sometimes they use head-to-head, sometimes they use computers. Example: Ole Miss beat Alabama the last time they met, but Bama is a tourney contender while Ole Miss is not.

It's always tough to figure out what the committee uses and why when it comes to separating two teams from each other.

Thanks for reading,
John

johnmrsec
johnmrsec

Bama Nation...

That stat is losses outside the Top 100 in RPI. It's spelled out just above the chart. Learn to read.

John

BamaNation
BamaNation

You know what happens when you assume, Johnny....

Trackbacks

  1. [...] in the first round while Alabama downed Ole Miss. The second game that night would be …From Best To Worst, A Comparison Of SEC Hoops Teams In 2010-11MrSECSEC Tournament Field SetTeam Speed Killsall 143 news [...]

  2. urlman cow says:

    Thorn of Girl

    Excellent info might be located on this net website.



Follow Us On:
Mobile MrSEC